<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Media Match &#187; Batman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.media-match.com/usa/blog/index.php/tag/batman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.media-match.com/usa/blog</link>
	<description>News, gossip, advice, hints and tips for searching tv production and film production jobs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:11:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Dark and Stormy Knight&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.media-match.com/usa/blog/index.php/uncategorized/a-dark-and-stormy-knight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.media-match.com/usa/blog/index.php/uncategorized/a-dark-and-stormy-knight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filmmaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ledger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-match.com/blog/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ll admit it: checking the box office numbers of “The Dark Knight” has become a habit with me.  I keep going to www.boxofficemojo.com, and staring at the total domestic take (over $363 million in just 15 days); I read various articles wondering if the film is poised to make a run at Titanic’s epic $600 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="Times New Roman;">I’ll admit it: checking the box office numbers of “The Dark Knight” has become a habit with me.<span style="yes;">  </span>I keep going to </span><a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/"><span style="Times New Roman;">www.boxofficemojo.com</span></a><span style="Times New Roman;">, and staring at the total domestic take (over $363 million in just 15 days); I read various articles wondering if the film is poised to make a run at Titanic’s epic $600 million domestic haul.<span style="yes;">  </span>And I find myself theorizing exactly why this film is generating as much noise as it is.<span style="yes;">  </span>The answer, I believe, lies beyond mere filmmaking.<span style="yes;">  </span>What we’re seeing is truly a small phenomenon – a perfect storm of a film.<span style="yes;">  </span>This is what happens when an excellent sequel (even better than its predecessor), rave critical reviews, a magnetic performance by a recently-deceased actor, and incessant word of mouth come together.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="Times New Roman;">It starts, of course, with the movie itself: wonderfully written and directed, with a haunting yet moving score to accompany the great action and suspense.<span style="yes;">  </span>Even when the first feedback was trickling in from sources close to the production, before any trailer was complete, there were raves about the dark story and the actors bringing it to life (everyone from Christian Bale, to Heath Ledger and Aaron Eckhart).<span style="yes;">  </span>And the early reviews were dead on:<span style="yes;">  </span><em>every</em> major actor in this picture is worthy of recognition.<span style="yes;">  </span>They add complexity to the story, as well as to their characters’ development within that framework.<span style="yes;">  </span>I feel I can watch this film again and again, if only to see each actor so skillfully inhabit their role, wondering in the back of my mind what’s <em>not</em> being said – the stories behind the stories.<span style="yes;">  </span>Take the Joker, for instance, who proclaims himself an agent of chaos, and yet so meticulously plans his schemes he&#8217;s almost like a deranged mathematician.<span style="yes;">  </span>Ledger plays both sides so well, and so believably, that one can’t help but sit back and marvel at the odd duality of this character, the way he can be almost two distinct psychotics in one.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="small;"><span style="Times New Roman;">People like to point to the death of Ledger as the main reason to the film’s success, but that is merely simplifying the issue.<span style="yes;">  </span>Rather, his passing is one of the cogs in a greater machine.<span style="yes;">  </span>Critics were already raving about his performance prior to his death; they will talk about it for months to come.<span style="yes;">  </span>And yes, there are some out there who will see the film only to watch the last performance of a young actor.<span style="yes;">  </span>But there are so many more who will be pulled in for the other reasons mentioned above.<span style="yes;"> </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="Times New Roman;">Look at the overwhelmingly positive collection of reviews.<span style="yes;">  </span>It is so rare to see critics getting behind a summer comic book movie, usually because they are so lean on story or character development.<span style="yes;">  </span>Not so in this case: out of 247 reviews on </span><a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/"><span style="Times New Roman;">www.rottentomatoes.com</span></a><span style="small;"><span style="Times New Roman;">, only 14 are negative.<span style="yes;">  </span>Read those reviews, and they’re less analytical assessments of the film, and more excited examinations of why the film is so good.<span style="yes;">  </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="small;"><span style="Times New Roman;">The best part is, the film actually manages to live up to the intense hype.<span style="yes;">  </span>What you read in the reviews is the same thing you hear from the average filmgoer; you can feel a breathless kind of enjoyment, can see a “there are so many reasons this film was good I can’t even pick one” gleam in the eye.<span style="yes;">  </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="small;"><span style="Times New Roman;">Which, in the end, might be the best explanation for why this film continues to do so well: seeing it once (or twice) is simply not enough.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span><span style="Times New Roman;">**<em>Note:  I have to say, I&#8217;ll be amazed if the film passes &#8220;</em>Titanic&#8221; <em>for the domestic box office record. Think about it this way: let&#8217;s say at best that &#8220;</em>The Dark Knight&#8221; <em>grosses approximately $18 million</em></span><span style="Times New Roman;"><em> tomorrow and another $12 million on Sunday (at BEST!!!)&#8230;  that would put the total box office at just under the $400 million mark.  That would mean that the film would have to earn another $200 million just to tie &#8220;</em>Titanic&#8221;&#8216;s <em>record.  To put it in perspective, that&#8217;s almost the entire domestic box office take of &#8216;</em>Batman Begins&#8217;<em>!  It&#8217;s a staggering figure when you think of it on those terms.</em></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span><span style="Times New Roman;"><em>The one silver lining in all of this is that </em>&#8216;The Dark Knight&#8217; <em>is on pace to reach the $400 million mark within 20 days (maybe 25)&#8211; obliterating the old record of 43 days set by &#8216;</em>Shrek 2&#8242;.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.media-match.com/usa/blog/index.php/uncategorized/a-dark-and-stormy-knight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don’t Call It a ‘Golden Age’…</title>
		<link>http://www.media-match.com/usa/blog/index.php/trends/don%e2%80%99t-call-it-a-%e2%80%98golden-age%e2%80%99%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.media-match.com/usa/blog/index.php/trends/don%e2%80%99t-call-it-a-%e2%80%98golden-age%e2%80%99%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 03:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Actor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filmmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franchise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rocky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.media-match.com/blog/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call it a renaissance if you want.  A rebirth of a specific aspect of American cinema: the franchise.  Whatever label you wish to give it, we are witnessing a revival of film series that were once thought dead – moribund franchises, that were had long ago outlived their usefulness.  “Batman”; “Superman”; “Rocky”; “James Bond”; even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt"><span style="Times New Roman;">Call it a renaissance if you want.<span style="yes">  </span>A rebirth of a specific aspect of American cinema: the franchise.<span style="yes">  </span>Whatever label you wish to give it, we are witnessing a revival of film series that were once thought dead – moribund franchises, that were had long ago outlived their usefulness. <span style="yes"> </span>“Batman”; “Superman”; “Rocky”; “James Bond”; even “Die Hard”.<span style="yes">  </span>It doesn’t take a film expert to see that these movies had descended into self-parodying shells of their former selves (admittedly, the first three more so than the latter two, but still, they were on their way).<span style="yes">  </span>Banking on brand awareness, producers were down to giving us stories that were basically dressed up recycling, always reliving the same plots but never pushing new bounds.<span style="yes">  </span>Brand awareness can only do so much, before you find yourself stuck with the conventional missteps of filmmakers eager to use a franchise for what it can offer, rather than what they can do for it.<span style="yes">  </span>“Batman &amp; Robin” was a prime example, as was “Rocky V”.<span style="yes">  </span>(Of course, there are those who feel both films are good, fun storytelling, and wouldn’t change a thing.. this is not meant for them).</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt"><span style="Times New Roman;">It now appears that it can sometimes take a decade of futility, and an utter lack of interest from the audience, before you can get a new lease on franchise life.<span style="yes">  </span>It takes time before you can get a Christopher Nolan to the table, or a Martin Campbell – men who re-create a series based on quality, not merely the recognition of the name.<span style="yes">  </span>All these years we’ve waited, and we finally have filmmakers who can take all the memorable images and ideas from our iconic heroes and make them real again – and can also make them relevant in a more modern world.<span style="yes">  </span>Whether it be Batman’s beginning, or James Bond’s first kill, we’re treated to an analysis of what makes these men great – faults and all.<span style="yes">  </span>In fact, it’s a testament to these filmmakers that they’re able to recognize the greatness in our most flawed characters – and it marks the beginning of an era in which our creations truly reflect the best and worst of us all.<span style="yes">  </span>That is what these writers and directors have done in re-imagining classic franchises, and as fans of cinema we should be grateful.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt"><span style="small;"><span style="Times New Roman;">As a final note, one can’t mention “Rocky V” without also discussing the fabulous work that Sylvester Stallone did in “Rocky Balboa”, the 6<sup>th</sup> Rocky film – and perhaps the best since the very first.<span style="yes">  </span>More so than </span></span><span style="small;"><span style="Times New Roman;">any of the other films mentioned above (even more than Bond’s “Casino Royale”) this newest Rocky film is remarkable because it not only reinvigorated a franchise that had become a joke (“What’s the latest movie up to, “Rocky 12”?), but it did so using the some of the same actors, in very much the same setting.<span style="yes">  </span>What Stallone did was, at its core, very simple: he wrote an incredibly truthful, self-assessing cinematic gem, that never tried to be more than it was.<span style="yes">  </span>And the result was dialogue so honest, that even as we’re watching Rocky say the lines, we’re also seeing Stallone say them himself.<span style="yes">  </span>Stallone should be credited with having the depth and technique to pull this off, and the self-awareness to make this one of Rocky’s best moments.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt"><span style="small;"></span><span style="small;"><span style="Times New Roman;">I for one am off to watch the new “Rambo”.<span style="yes">  </span>After that, I will eagerly await the next Batman and James Bond films, knowing they’re in good hands&#8230; for now.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.media-match.com/usa/blog/index.php/trends/don%e2%80%99t-call-it-a-%e2%80%98golden-age%e2%80%99%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

